 |
The Morning-After Pill Conspiracy |
          |
Latest
News - Action Alerts
Supreme
Court
Upholds First Federal Ban on an Abortion
Procedure
Andrea Costello & Erin
Mahoney The Court's decision to uphold the federal abortion ban now gives anti-choice federal and state lawmakers the green light to launch countless attacks on abortion. We are in a serious fight. We must show the Supreme Court, and our lawmakers, that women will not stand for decisions like this. When Roe was decided, the Supreme Court knew that women would be in the streets in an uproar if they didn't find in our favor. We need to send that message again today. It is time for women to join the feminist movement in droves. YOU can change the direction of the country by joining a feminist group and giving it your money. The Supreme Court has now elevated the rights of the "life of the unborn" over women. Women are the ones that become pregnant and should be able to make our own decisions about if, and when, to have children. The Court's majority opinion leaves women out of this equation and allows the state's supposed interest in "promoting fetal life" to trump women's rights to control the direction of our lives. Two Justices, Thomas and Scalia, even went so far as to say that "the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe, has no basis in the Constitution." As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg forcefully said in her dissenting opinion, "the Act, and the Court's defense of it, cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this Court...they center on a woman's autonomy to determine her life's course, and thus to enjoy equal citizenship stature." The majority of the Supreme Court has confirmed that they would rather women resume being less than equal and, instead, live as second class citizens. Women won't stand for this. Andrea Costello is an attorney with the National Lawyers Guild. Erin Mahoney is Co-Chair of the Women’s Liberation Birth Control Project. **************************************************************** Annie Tummino, one of the leaders of the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy, is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Tummino vs. von Eschenbach. Other plaintiffs include Erin Mahoney, Stephanie Seguin, Kelly Mangan, Jenny Brown, Candace Churchill, Carol Giardina, Lori Tinney, and Francie Hunt, who are all coordiantors of the MAPConspiracy. The Center for Reproductive Rights and The Latina Institute for Reproductive Health are also listed in the lawsuit. This ongoing lawsuit charges the FDA with making decisions on the status of the Morning-After Pill based on sexism, not science. The lawsuit aims to acquire full over-the-counter status to the Morning-After Pill for all women, of all ages. JUDGE PERMITS CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS TO SUBPOENA WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS IN LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FDA OVER "MORNING AFTER PILL" Judge Cites "Strong Showing of Bad Faith" by Government as Grounds for Granting Further Discovery U.S. Magistrate Judge Viktor Pohorelsky ruled that the Center for Reproductive Rights can subpoena White House documents as part of its lawsuit (Tummino vs. von Eschenbach) against the Food and Drug Administration for its failure to make Plan B available without a prescription for women of all ages. Concluding on November 6 that the Center demonstrated a "strong showing of bad faith" by the FDA in its decision-making around Plan B, Judge Pohorelsky also rejected the government's request to block the deposition of former White House policy aide Jay Lefkowitz, and granted the Center's request to depose deputy director of the FDA's Office of New Drugs, Dr. Sandra Kweder. The Center will subpoena the White House for the following documents: communications between the Domestic Policy Office of the White House and select employees of the FDA regarding Plan B between April 2003 and September 2006. "We are pleased that the court is not only allowing us to further explore seemingly inappropriate White House involvement in the FDA's decision making, but is also recognizing that our claims of the agency's bad faith are well founded," said Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Our months of discovery have revealed that FDA scientists attempted to carry out a scientific approval process, but higher level officials made a mockery of that process, by ignoring the results and bowing to political pressures." In his ruling, Judge Pohorelsky found "five categories of information to be reflective of improper FDA behavior: 1) Involvement in the Plan B OTC-approval process by high-level FDA officials who, historically and statutorily, do not generally participate in OTC-switch proceedings; 2) Inappropriate (non-scientific) considerations by FDA officials imported into the Plan B OTC-switch process, including those brought to the FDA's attention by third parties; 3) Indications of efforts to chart an unusual course in dealing with the OTC-switch applications, including veiled attempts to delay reaching a final decision; 4) Indications that a decision had already been made or that efforts were made to steer the application towards a specific result under the direction of higher level officials before completion of the scientific process; 5) Indications of potential retaliation by upper management against FDA employees who disagree with management's views that Plan B OTC-access be restricted." On August 23, the FDA announced its decision to make Plan B available without a prescription, but only for women 18 and older and only behind the pharmacy counter. The Center for Reproductive Rights is still pursuing its lawsuit to ensure that the Plan B is granted true over-the-counter status and made widely available to women of all ages, particularly the most vulnerable population, young women. In 2005, the Center filed suit against the FDA in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The suit was filed on behalf of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (ARHP), National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, and individuals from a grassroots advocacy group, the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy. **************************************************************** 
See the
Morning-After Pill
Conspiracy in Jane Magazine. (Nov 06) Annie Tummino is quoted! Protest photo is highlighted! Click magazine cover to see the article. August 1, 2006 - F.D.A. Shifts View on Next-Day PillMAPconspiracy's responseFebruary 24, 2006 - COURT
FINDS STRONG
SHOWING The new Bill in Congress that would put the Morning-After Pill "behind-the-counter" and the Government Accountability Office releases their report on the FDA's unusual handling of MAP decision. September 28, 2005 - FDA Commissioner, Lester Crawford, Resigns after two months in post! Says the controversy over the Morning-After Pill was too much to handle. August 31, 2005 - Susan Wood, Director, Office of Women's Health, Food and Drug Administration, Resigns over Morning-After Pill denial. |